There is a sense out there -- is there not? -- of
holding back: You don't want to spend what you
used to.
Everyone has drawn to a more conservative stance because no one knows what will happen next
(and not just economically).
One hears this all the time: folks are waiting for the other shoe to drop.
There is The Great
Uneasiness and that uneasiness is because we know in our
spirits that for a few decades we have been living in a bubble (of
falsities).
This we wrote before the recent
Wall Street protests, which may have some merit but with which, in other
ways, we do not agree; at least, we differ politically (and culturally)
with many of the
protesters.
It has always been our opinion that
capitalism is a great system when it is based on conservative Christian
values -- and when it is as it used to be: a system that rewards those who
contribute the most to society (as opposed to finessing it).
How things have changed.
There has always been abuse
(see the
sweat shops or slaughterhouses or monopolies of the last century)
but a shock it is to learn that banks only have twenty percent or even
just
ten percent of the actual money -- the capital -- to back the
money they
lend. In other words, they have enough in reserve only to cover a
certain
number of loans in the theory that they would never have to cover
more
than that. In some cases, financial "instruments" need no capital
whatsoever!
Folks with mathematics degrees from
fashionable schools have invented all kinds of bizarre new financial "products":
collateralized debt obligations, credit swap debts. There are negative
amortized loans in which you buy a home but pay less than usual in
interest and as a
result your principal increases. Or, there are loans in which you pay interest only
(really, you own nothing).
They made these loans to folks who
were required to provide virtually no documentation of income.
So, banks lent money or mortgage originators gave mortgages that
were less substantial than air and made money
doing so not just from the extraordinary interest you pay (a person often
pays nearly as much in interest as the cost of a home over the period of thirty
years when all the interest is tallied) but from the fees they collect by tranching and
selling pieces of your mortgage -- for example, the interest -- to
those who are willing to take a risk that the rate will increase and
buy the interest on mortgages like a lottery ticket.
One entity out there may own your
interest, while another is backing your principal -- by borrowing from
another bank, which also generates a fee. Our mortgages have been
securitized: turned into bonds and "securities." Chips at the
poker table. Meanwhile, there are loan
originators that are not banks and are not even subject to normal banking
regulations.
In large part, they're the ones who took on risky, "subprime" borrowers
without even minimal capital backing (in the event of a flood of
defaults). The funding mechanism for homeowning became a "shaky pyramid of
debt." Where was the Federal Reserve. What is the Federal Reserve?
(Should it even exist?)
"Long before anybody thought to use
credit default swaps to short mortgage bonds, Wall Street firms had taken
to combining credit default swaps on a variety of corporate bonds and
creating CDOs out of them," write two financial authors in the perhaps
aptly entitled bestseller All the Devils Are Here. "They were
called synthetic CDOs because the CDOs didn't contain 'real' collateral;
rather they were based on the performance of existing bonds held by
someone else."
Huh?
Then there's the stock market: it moves like a roller-coaster and
like a roller coaster is surrounded by air.
Remember when stocks broke the 1,000
barrier?
Think of this: in the late 1980s
the Dow surged to 2000. It was
under 1000 the previous decade. It would eventually rise to 13,000. It is now still
near that point: despite a plummet, above 10,000. Can you explain what makes the worth of
the market more than five times what is was twenty-five years ago, and more
than ten times what it was in the mid-1970s -- when inflation has risen
only by a fraction of that?
How can it suddenly be at 10,000 --
when, in many ways, the U.S. produces less than it used to?
At the same time stocks increased more than sixfold,
the value of the dollar has not even doubled (what cost you a dollar in
1988 now costs $1.92).
This indicates a structure, and
society, that is
artificial.
What changed so radically to make
everything so valuable?
Why should stocks be worth three
times what they were adjusting even for inflation?
And why do commodities brokers living the high life on the Upper East
Side of
Manhattan make more money than the farmers who grow the commodities?
The average pay for Goldman Sachs
35,700 employees was $369,651 last year (you read that right, and it is
down from what it was; in 2007, a year of record pay, all workers tallied
together including receptionists at Goldman Sachs were paid an average of
$575,000).
Our financial system is not rational.
Should it even exist, in anywhere near the size that it is? It has been
turned into a game played by math whizzes who use Byzantine formulas to concoct constantly new opaque "products."
There are securities that even Alan Greenspan says he doesn't understand. This all started up
during the 1980s when deregulation of the financial community -- and a
dire lack of oversight -- allowed all kinds of entities, from pension
funds to insurance companies, to join in as the holders of mortgages, as they do any
stock out there.
Bizarre "products" were derived
("derivatives") in ever more
complex games of risk. Your lender doesn't even have the money to cover
its loans! It borrows (see again, the tranche) to lend! Everything was
"leveraged." Bets were made on securities owned elsewhere. Some securities are even
called "synthetic" -- because they are just that: manufactured
(with no real backing). Games are played. Paper is shuffled back and
forth. It is poker with
ever-changing cards. For at least three decades, wealth in our nation has
been materialized out of thin air and now that bubble, the balloon, is
leaking badly.
Notes an analyst for Moody's: "We
may have encouraged financial institutions to grow in ways that do not
directly facilitate or enhance the reason for having a financial system in
the first place."
There are other bubbles.
There are the tremendous costs of
college (for exactly what final product?). There are medical costs. There
are unsustainable pensions. And we can get back to those loans: the Bible
-- and the Catholic Church -- have long warned against usury, which is
defined as excessive interest and in the purest third-meaning in the
dictionary even interest, period: we are not supposed to make a profit
over a loan, or at least not one that is engineered to enrich the lender
(and cause distress to the one who borrows).
That's Christian?
Our society is off base -- at least if you study the precepts of
Catholicism.
For Catholicism and its saints have
long preached that one should not charge as much as one can (soak the
consumer for everything one can get) but rather sell an item at a price
that simply and only tallies the money spent on creating the product and
the actual hours one put into the effort.
We live in a society where squeezing as much as you can out of a
fellow human is
considered smart business.
We'll see in purgatory.
It is not the Christian way. The "markups" on many products --
by the standards of the Catechism -- are not conscionable.
Look at what pharmaceuticals cost --
and how they suddenly drop so drastically in price when they no longer
necessitate a prescription.
Do you remember how phone companies
used to charge so much for long distance that calling from one side of the
state to another could cost five or ten dollars for an hour?
Now, there is unlimited long distance -- meaning it hardly ever cost the
companies anything to start with, or certainly not nearly what they gouged.
Go try and buy a cell phone now.
It has shifted there: you need a data package -- at another $30 a month.
Did you ever analyze how much you spend on your cell?
Meanwhile, health care continues to skyrocket.
It's one growth industry despite the recession. Its costs have increased
nine percent in the past year!
We ourselves -- our bodies -- have become commodities.
Incredibly, many of those most
abused by the greedy have been orchestrated into defending them.
Here is paragraph 2424 of the
Catechism:
"A theory that makes profit the exclusive norm and ultimate end of
economic activity is morally unacceptable. The disordered desire for money
cannot but produce perverse effects. It is one of the causes of the many
conflicts which disturb the social order.
"A system that 'subordinates the basic rights of individuals and of
groups to the collective organization of production' is contrary to human
dignity. Every practice that reduces persons to nothing more than a means of
profit enslaves man, leads to idolizing money, and contributes to the spread
of atheism. 'You cannot serve God and mammon.'"
If you made money
this way, it is perhaps time to discern
future income.
Capitalism is a
fantastic system -- when backed by Catholic morals.
The old law was that people were compensated for what they contributed
honestly.
No longer.
Now, it's the opposite.
Those who manipulate and have assumed control over our financial community
sell air and often walk away with billions, even though they not
only didn't
contribute, not only didn't invent some incredible new product, not only
didn't serve anyone, but took advantage of millions.
If this sounds overheated, our
apology; it is not said with anger. We are commissioned to report the
truth. Read that book on the financial
crisis.
Indeed.
You will be educated.
You will also be shocked.
Have you noticed all the store sales now -- how little you pay for clothes
at some shops, now that they need your business?
That tells you the incredible, excessive profit margins that had been in
place.
At half price, they still turn a nice profit.
Meanwhile, you have to talk to a
machine on the phone or go online and struggle through a maze even to give
someone your money.
That's dignity?
"The development of economic activity and growth in production are meant
to provide for the needs of human beings. Economic life is not meant
solely to multiply goods produced and increase profit or power; it is
ordered first of all to the service of persons, of the whole man, and of
the entire human community. Economic activity, conducted according to its
own proper methods, is to be exercised within the limits of the moral
order, in keeping with social justice so as to correspond to God's plan
for man" (Catechism 2426).
Go ahead and figure out how much interest you have paid on your house --
in all probability, to someone who didn't even have the real money to lend
(just the financial positioning). Or who holds that second lien
(sometimes, on a negative-amortization loan).
"It is a sin against the dignity of persons and their fundamental rights
to reduce them by violence to their productive value or to a source
of profit" (2414).
While there is currently a clamor for deregulation, it was ironically the
opposite -- deregulation, in the financial community, in the Eighties and
Nineties -- that has led us to a false economy, a false standard of
living, and the brink of a true crisis.
We are not at the end of it.
We may patch things for a year or two. We may waste money on "stimulus."
We may print money backed by nothing.
But the crisis will not end until we descend to the same extent as we have
risen artificially.
There is much more until we reach that point.
Look around.
A recession, perhaps; but not yet a very deep one. Right now, folks are
perhaps cutting down on the number of cell phones in the family, and
shaving down a few nights out at restaurants, and looking for bargains at
J.C. Penney's or Belk's or Macy's. Macy's!
Frugality is starting to take hold, if only as yet in a small way (and
thank God -- Who wants us to waste nothing!). We will be better off for
it. We are being simplified. Time spent spending money can now be spent in
prayer.
We can feel and pray for those who have lost honest jobs. So many have!
And there are certainly good, devout
rich people (including in the financial sector).
Don't throw them in with the
bathwater.
But when we note that the biggest health problem among the
rich and poor in our
nation is obesity, we can see that we are certainly not near anything like
a depression -- although a depression it would be if the real money were
counted, currency backed by actual manufacture and
sweat or silver or gold, by real land, by real estate -- not the fluff-stuff of that casino called Wall Street.
-- by Michael H. Brown
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.