The “Night of the Big Wind” is still the stuff of folklore in
Ireland. On January 6, 1839, an unexpected hurricane slammed into the
Emerald Isle from the North Atlantic, decimating neighborhoods from
County Mayo to Dublin and becoming the worst storm ever recorded in
Irish history. Waves were said to have crashed over
Ireland’s towering Cliffs of Moher in County Clare. Perhaps most
striking was the weather pattern in the run-up to the storm: an
unexpectedly strong snowfall on January 5 followed by a warm front on
the Epiphany, colliding with a second cold front that would produce the
first of the hurricane-force winds.
The present political uproar over abortion law in Ireland—one of only
three western European nations, together with Poland and Malta, which
continue to ban the practice—seems to have arrived with similar
ferocity. The warning signs, however, are decades-old.
Ireland has been “abortion-free,” as pro-life group Youth Defence
calls it, for as long as anyone can remember. The illegality of
abortion has been codified in some form since 1861, and in 1983 the
Constitution of Ireland was explicitly amended by the public to
guarantee the equal right to life of the mother and the unborn child.
The measure passed with sixty-seven percent of the vote in a decade when
abortion restrictions were being repealed all around the world.
Since then, global abortion rights organizations have aggressively
targeted the island nation. The Irish Family Planning Association
(IFPA), associated with the International Planned Parenthood Federation,
violated Irish law repeatedly in the 1990s—most recently advising women
their abortions from authorities, putting women’s lives in danger in
the event of postoperative complications. And several thousand women
receive assistance each year to seek abortions overseas in Great
Britain, though the proportion of Irish women who receive abortions is
dwarfed by the abortion rate in the United Kingdom and the Unites
Meanwhile, Ireland has maintained one of the lowest maternal mortality rates in the world. It is safer to be an expectant mother in pro-life Ireland than pro-choice America or Britain.
Ireland’s experience contradicts the “legal abortion makes pregnancy
safer” logic, which perhaps explains why the pro-abortion movement has
had its eyes trained on Ireland for so long. Ireland is an example of a
healthcare system where the rights of both the baby and the mother are
upheld equally—to the detriment of no one.
The next chapter of the abortion debate unfolded in 1992, when the
Irish Supreme Court ruled that women had the right to an abortion if the
mother’s life was imperiled by the pregnancy. Known as the “X case,”
the decision sparked an ongoing debate about how to interpret the
legislative mandate from the court, with successive governments
reluctant to touch the issue for fear of upsetting the public.
The attack on pro-life Ireland resumed with a vengeance in 2005, when
three women accused Ireland of violating their basic rights under the
European Convention on Human Rights by prohibiting abortion. A, B and C v. Ireland, as the case was known, was a major pro-life victory. In its ruling, the European Court of Human Rights threw out the notion that abortion was a fundamental human right.
The latest uproar, which threatens to finally overthrow the pro-life
consensus in Ireland, stems from the case of Savita Halappanavar, an
Indian woman who miscarried and died of sepsis during her pregnancy in
Galway. The case has become the rallying cry of abortion rights
supporters, who maintain (along with Savita’s husband) that her OB/GYN,
Dr. Katherine Astbury, refused to provide her with a life-saving
abortion. In response, Prime Minister Enda Kenny has proposed a bill
that would “clarify” the abortion statute in Ireland, making a clear
exception in the constitutional ban for cases of maternal health and
including an unrelated provision allowing for suicide as a reason for
seeking terminating the pregnancy.
The problem is that the legislation is redundant
at best and a Trojan horse at worst. Abortion is already permitted when
the attending physician deems the pregnancy a threat to the mother’s
life. In fact, once the diagnosis of life-threatening sepsis came, an abortion was planned by Dr. Astbury. The problem was that the diagnosis came a day too late. As Eilis O’Hanlon of the Independent summarized,
“It is clear that Savita died because she had severe sepsis which was
not properly treated; an earlier abortion may have saved her life, but
the reason she did not get one was because doctors failed to ascertain
that her life was in danger.”
This hasn’t stopped Kenny, who continues to insist he is a pro-life
politician working to bring “clarity” to the law. Never mind that the
organization representing Ireland’s doctors feels that the law is unnecessary, and never mind that countless medical experts have testified that abortion can compound the risk for women contemplating suicide.
The result, whether Kenny intends it or not, will mean a fatal break
in the Irish pro-life consensus. The suicide loophole, which allows a
woman to have an abortion if she receives the approval of three doctors,
will quickly be exploited when information spreads regarding who the
doctors sympathetic to the pro-choice cause are (see the similar case of New Zealand). And, within no time at all, Ireland will have de facto abortion on demand.
But as opposition has grown, Kenny has hunkered down—realizing that
the legislation has become a referendum on his government. He’s
forbidden members of his party, Fine Gael, from voting their conscience
on the bill, slated for a vote this summer. All the while, public
opinion has held remarkably steady
on the basic question of abortion. As of mid-2013 only thirty-nine
percent of those polled supported abortion on demand, indicating little
movement since 1983.
Despite this, today a majority of the Irish public supports Kenny’s
bill, swayed by the Savita case—not to mention other factors chipping
away at the pro-life position for years, like the eroding influence of
the Roman Catholic Church. What the public fails to see, however, is
that the bill is only the first front in a long-planned,