In
doing research for an Our Sunday Visitor column (my regular Q and A
column), I found it necessary to comb through some of the early Church
sources regarding the teaching against abortion. I thought it might be
helpful here, by way of a resource, to post some of those teachings
here. While I have seen a quote here and there, I was actually quite
pleased to find several quotes I had not seen or read before on the
question of abortion and to assemble in one place a good number of
quotes.
I also ask your help in adding to the list
I have assembled here. For the sake of some scope I have limited the
quotes to generally no later than the 4th Century. While you can feel
free to add from later periods as well, I find the early centuries to be
of particular value, due to their antiquity.
As with many quotes from the ancient world, some of the quotes herein are perhaps quite harsh, and
some may be critiqued at their focus essentially on the women who
procure abortion, with little mention of the men involved. In our own
time the Church is more careful to articulate and understand that
abortion often occurs when women are under duress, or on account of
family crisis, poverty and other social factors. Hence, we who speak
against abortion must be ready and able, as I think the Church admirably
is, to assist women and families in crisis to give birth. Yet the
churchmen who are quoted below were men of their times, and, as my
father was often heard to say of the “old days” Things were tough all over.
Whatever the tone, the teaching is not at all unclear, and for this we can be grateful.
A couple of years ago a former Speaker
of the House, whose name need not be mentioned here at all, showed
herself an amateur theologian lacking in even basic knowledge by
claiming (on what she called Jesuitical authority) that the Church
teaching on abortion was no older than the 1950s. The usually cautious
American Bishops lost no time in issuing vigorous correction. And
rightly so, of course, as quotes like these will show.
Here then are some of the quotes:
The Didache (“The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles”) ca 110 AD. Thou
shalt not murder a child by abortion. (2:2)…The Way of Death is filled
with people who are…murderers of children and abortionists of God’s
creatures. (5:1-2)
Letter of Barnabas, circa 125: You shall not kill either the fetus by abortion or the new born
Athenagoras the Athenian (To
Marcus Aurelius), ca 150 AD: “We say that those women who use drugs to
bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God
for the abortion…, [For we] regard the very fœtus in the womb as a
created being, and therefore an object of God’s care… (# 35).
Clement of Alexandria: (circa 150 – 215 AD) Our
whole life can go on in observation of the laws of nature, if we gain
dominion over our desires from the beginning and if we do not kill, by
various means of a perverse art, the human offspring, born according to
the designs of divine providence; for these women who, if order to hide
their immorality, use abortive drugs which expel the child completely
dead, abort at the same time their own human feelings. Paedagogus, 2
Tertullian circa 160-240 AD: For
us, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the
human being derives blood from other parts of the body for its
sustenance. To hinder a birth is merely a speedier man-killing; nor
does it matter when you take away a life that is born, or destroy one
that is coming to birth. That is a man which is going to be one: you
have the fruit already in the seed. Apology 9:6
Tertullian (circa 160 – 240 AD): …we
are not permitted, since murder has been prohibited to us once and for
all, even to destroy …the fetus in the womb. It makes no difference
whether one destroys a life that has already been born or one that is in
the process of birth. Apology (9:7-8)
Tertullian circa 160-240 AD: [John
the Baptist and Jesus] were both alive while still in the womb.
Elizabeth rejoiced as the infant leaped in her womb; Mary glorifies the
Lord because Christ within inspired her. Each mother recognizes her
child and is known by her child who is alive, being not merely souls
but also spirits. De Aninta 26:4
Hippolytus (circa 170-236 AD): Whence
certain women, reputed believers, began to resort to drugs for
producing sterility and to gird themselves round, so as to expel what
was conceived on account of their not wanting to have a child either by a
slave or by any paltry fellow, for the sake of their family and
excessive wealth. Behold, into how great impiety that lawless one has
proceeded, by inculcating adultery and murder at the same time. From “Refutation of all Heresies” 9:7
Minucius Felix (180 – 225 AD): Some
women take medicines to destroy the germ of future life in their own
bodies. They commit infanticide before they have given birth to the
infant (Octavious (30, 2))
St. Basil the Great (330 – 379 AD): The
woman who purposely destroys her unborn child is guilty of murder. With
us there is no nice enquiry as to its being formed or unformed. In this
case it is not only the being about to be born who is vindicated, but
the woman in her attack upon herself; because in most cases women who
make such attempts die. The destruction of the embryo is an additional
crime, a second murder, at all events if we regard it as done with
intent. The punishment, however, of these women should not be for life,
but for the term of ten years. And let their treatment depend not on
mere lapse of time, but on the character of their repentance. Letter 188:2
St. Ambrose: (339 to 397 AD) The
poor expose their children, the rich kill the fruit of their own bodies
in the womb, lest their property be divided up, and they destroy their
own children in the womb with murderous poisons. and before life has
been passed on, it is annihilated. Hexaemeron”, (5, 18, 58)
St. John Chrysostom (circa 340 – 407 AD): Why
sow where the ground makes it its care to destroy the fruit? Where
there are many efforts at abortion? Where there is murder before the
birth? For you do not even let the harlot remain a mere harlot, but make
her a murderer also. You see how drunkenness leads to whoredom,
whoredom to adultery, adultery to murder; or rather something even worse
than murder. For I have no real name to give it, since it does not
destroy the thing born but prevents its being born. Why then do you
abuse the gift of God and fight with His laws, and follow after what is a
curse as if a blessing, and make the place of procreation a chamber for
murder, and arm the woman that was given for childbearing unto
slaughter? Homily 24 on Romans
St. Jerome (circa 342-420 AD): I
cannot bring myself to speak of the many virgins who daily fall and are
lost to the bosom of the church, their mother….Some go so far as to
take potions, that they may insure barrenness, and thus murder human
beings almost before their conception. Some, when they find themselves
with child through their sin, use drugs to procure abortion, and when
(as often happens) they die with their offspring, they enter the lower
world laden with the guilt not only of adultery against Christ but also
of suicide and child murder. Letter 22:13
The Synod of Elvira, 306 AD: If
a woman becomes pregnant by committing adultery, while her husband is
absent, and after the act she destroys the child, it is proper to keep
her from communion until death, because she has doubled her crime. Canon 63.
The Synod of Ancyra, 314 AD, Concerning
women who commit fornication, and destroy that which they have
conceived, or who are employed in making drugs for abortion, a former
decree excluded them until the hour of death, and to this some have
assented. Nevertheless, being desirous to use somewhat greater lenity,
we have ordained that they fulfill ten years [of penance], according to
the prescribed degrees. (Canon 21).
Council of Trullo (692 AD): Those
who give drugs for procuring abortion, and those who receive poisons
to kill the fœtus, are subjected to the penalty of murder. (Canon 91)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.